The Political Quarantine
An analytical exploration of political exclusion strategies, known as the cordon sanitaire, and their impact on democratic discourse and coalition formation across various nations.
What is it? ๐ Explore Examples ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Defining the Cordon Sanitaire
Political Exclusion Strategy
In political science, a cordon sanitaire refers to the refusal of one or more political parties to cooperate with specific other political parties. This strategy is often employed when a party's ideology or strategies are perceived as unacceptable or extremist by the broader political establishment.[1] The term, originating from French, literally translates to 'sanitary cordon,' evoking the idea of isolating a threat.
Social Norm and Discourse
The application of a cordon sanitaire can function as a significant social norm within a political system. It shapes inter-party relations and influences public discourse by signaling which political actors are considered outside the bounds of legitimate political engagement.[2] This exclusion can occur due to perceived populism, far-left, or far-right ideologies.
Impact on Governance
The implementation of a cordon sanitaire can profoundly affect coalition building and government formation. It may lead to the exclusion of significant political forces, potentially resulting in minority governments, grand coalitions between ideological rivals, or prolonged periods of political instability as parties navigate these exclusionary boundaries.
Global Manifestations
Austria
Following Jรถrg Haider's leadership of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPร) in 1986, other parties largely refused cooperation until 2000. This political isolation persisted until the formation of the first Schรผssel government, which included the FPร, lasting from 2000 to 2005.
Belgium
In Belgium, the term gained prominence with the exclusion of the far-right Vlaams Blok (later Vlaams Belang) from coalition governments due to its perceived racist ideology. This led to the formation of grand coalitions among other parties. A related "media cordon sanitaire" also restricts live appearances of far-right politicians.
Canada
Resistance to coalition governments involving the Bloc Quรฉbรฉcois, which advocates for Quebecois independence, has been noted. However, a notable instance occurred during the 2008-2009 parliamentary dispute, where an agreement for supply and confidence was made between the Bloc, Liberals, and NDP, though the government was never formed.
Czech Republic
The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSฤM) has faced a de facto exclusion from national coalitions due to strong anti-Communist sentiment among other parties. Similarly, Miroslav Slรกdek's nationalist party faced significant ostracism in the 1990s.
Estonia
Parties like the Constitution Party and the Centre Party have experienced exclusion from ruling coalitions, often citing differing views on historical interpretations (Soviet occupation) or current foreign policy. The cordon against the Conservative People's Party of Estonia was also noted between 2015 and 2019.
France
The French electoral system and the "republican front" strategy have historically isolated the Front National (now Rassemblement National). While the cordon sanitaire against the RN has weakened with Marine Le Pen's leadership and changing political alignments, attempts to form broader coalitions against perceived "extremes" on both left and right continue.
Germany
Historically, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) faced exclusion. Post-reunification, the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) and its successor, The Left, were largely excluded from federal coalitions. More recently, a "firewall" (Brandmauer) policy has been applied against the Alternative for Germany (AfD), though recent events have tested this boundary.
Italy
During the Cold War, the Italian Communist Party (PCI) and the Italian Social Movement (MSI) were excluded from Christian Democratic-led governments. The end of the Cold War and political scandals reshaped these dynamics.
Israel
The Joint List and its constituent parties have faced a de facto cordon sanitaire for not supporting Zionism. Historically, the Kahanist party Kach was ostracized, with significant political figures actively avoiding engagement.
Latvia
Parties such as the Latvian Russian Union, For Stability!, and the Social Democratic Party "Harmony" have been excluded from national ruling coalitions, with the cordon against Harmony reportedly remaining in place.
Lithuania
The Communist Party of Lithuania (CPSU) was banned and excluded. Later, the Liberal Democratic Party and the Way of Courage party also experienced periods of political isolation from coalition negotiations.
Netherlands
The Centre Party and Centre Democrats faced ostracism. More recently, Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom (PVV) was subject to a period of non-cooperation by major parties, though this cordon has reportedly ended following the 2023 election results.
Norway
For decades, parliamentary parties refused to formally join governing coalitions with the Progress Party. This cordon was broken in 2013 when the Conservative Party entered into cooperation.
Portugal
Since gaining parliamentary representation in 2019, the conservative party Chega has faced attempts to establish a cordon sanitaire, with most parties reiterating an unwillingness to associate with them, famously encapsulated by the phrase "Nรฃo รฉ nรฃo" (No means no).
Slovenia
Following the 2018 election, liberal, centre-left, and left-wing parties declared a de facto cordon sanitaire against the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) due to its rhetoric and alleged foreign financing, despite SDS winning the election.
Spain
In Catalonia, a coalition agreement in 2003 included a commitment to veto the People's Party (PP) from subnational and national instances, a point later criticized by the Catalan President.
Sweden
A policy of non-cooperation was adopted against the Sweden Democrats (SD). However, this cordon has been tested and partially broken through municipal coalitions and signaled openness from major parties like the Moderates and Christian Democrats, culminating in the SD's support for the 2022 minority government.
Turkey
Pro-Kurdish parties, such as the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), face a cordon sanitaire due to accusations of cooperation with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). Historically, Islamist parties also faced exclusion and bans.
United Kingdom
The British National Party (BNP) has been largely ostracized by the political mainstream. Even the UK Independence Party (UKIP), often labeled far-right itself, has refused cooperation with the BNP. Support for BNP candidates in local government and European Parliament elections has been met with minimal official support.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Cordon Sanitaire Politics" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Academic Disclaimer
Important Considerations
This content has been generated by an AI model and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is based on publicly available data from Wikipedia and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the 'cordon sanitaire' concept in politics.
This is not political advice. The information presented here should not be construed as endorsement or critique of any political party or strategy. Analysis of political phenomena requires nuanced understanding and engagement with primary sources and expert commentary. Always consult diverse and credible sources for a complete perspective on political matters.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any interpretations or actions taken based on the information provided herein. Users are encouraged to conduct their own research and critical analysis.